Abstract
AbstractSome of the first ‘automated’ vehicles to be deployed on our roads will require a system of shared driving with a human driver. While this creates technical and operational challenges, the law must also facilitate such a transfer. One method may be to obtain the driver’s consent to share operational responsibility and to delineate legal responsibility between vehicle and driver in the event of an accident. Consent is a voluntary agreement where an individual is aware of the potential consequences of their consent, including the risks. The driver of a partially automated vehicle must be informed of potential risks before giving consent to share operational responsibility. This paper will refer to the inherent dangers associated with shared operational responsibility, in particular where there has been a request for the driver to take back control from the automated vehicle during the journey. Drivers are likely to experience delay in regaining situational awareness, making such operational transfers hazardous. It is argued that where an interactive digital interface is used to convey information, such as driver responsibility, risk and legal terms, drivers may fail to sufficiently process such communications due to fundamental weaknesses in human–machine interaction. The use of an interactive digital interface alone may be inadequate to effectively communicate information to drivers. If the problems identified are not addressed, it is argued that driver consent may be inconsequential, and fail to facilitate a predicable demarcation of legal responsibility between automated vehicles and drivers. Ongoing research into automated vehicle driver training is considered as part of the preparation required to design driver education to a level whereby drivers may be able to sufficiently understand the responsibilities involved in operating a partially automated vehicle, which has implications for future driver training, licensing and certification.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference77 articles.
1. Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behaviour in the age of information. Science 347:509
2. Agrawal R, Wright T, Samuel S, Zilberstein S, Fisher D (2017) Effects of change in environment on the minimum tikme to situation awarenessin transfer of control scenarios. Transporation Research Record 2663(1):126–133
3. Alonso Raposo M, Ciuffo B, Makridis M, Thiel C (2017) The r-evolution of driving: from connected vehicles to coordinated automated road transport. JRC Science for Policy Report
4. Alrefaie MT, Summerskill S, Jackson TW (2019) In a heart beat: using driver’s physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles. Accident Anal Prev 131:180
5. Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2006) Public attitudes, perceptions and behaviours towards cabin safety communications. ATSB Research and Analysis Report, Aviation Safety Research Grant- B2004/0238
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献