Abstract
AbstractEditorial scholarship is once again in a state of upheaval. Digital scholarly editing, for all it has achieved, has not accommodated the increasingly digital nature of cultural production and consumption. The theories and practices of digital scholarly editing need to better account for born-digital cultural materials like social media content, digital fiction, and video games. This paper discusses the state-of-the-art in digital scholarly editing, and advocates for future forms of digital scholarly editing and publishing suited to the born-digital.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Andrews, TL, and JJ van Zundert. 2018. “What Are You Trying to Say? The Interface as an Integral Element of Argument.” In Digital Scholarly Editions as Interfaces, edited by Roman Bleier, Martina Bürgermeister, Helmut W. Klug, Frederike Neuber, and Gerlinde Schneider, 3–33. BoD. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/9106/
2. Apollon D, Bélisle C, Régnier P (2017) Digital Critical Editions. Urbana, Chicago, and Springfield. University of Illinois Press, eds
3. Arbuckle, A 2014. “Considering The Waste Land for IPad and Weird Fiction as Models for the Public Digital Edition.” Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.50
4. Arbuckle, A, and R Siemens. 2023. “Digital Humanities, Open Social Scholarship, and Engaged Publics.” In The Bloomsbury Handbook to the Digital Humanities, edited by James O’Sullivan, 397–407. London: Bloomsbury Academic
5. Blanke T, Pierazzo E, Stokes PA (2014) “Digital Publishing Seen from the Digital Humanities.”. Logos 25(2):16–27
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献