Futuramas of the present: the “driver problem” in the autonomous vehicle sociotechnical imaginary

Author:

Braun RobertORCID,Randell RichardORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe visions surrounding “self-driving” or “autonomous” vehicles are an exemplary instance of a sociotechnical imaginary: visions of a future technology that has yet to be developed or is in the process of development. One of the central justifications for the development of autonomous vehicles is the claim that they will reduce automobility related death and injury. Central to this narrative is the assumption that more than 90% of road crashes are the result of “driver error.” This paper describes the process by which this statistic has been constructed within road safety research and subsequently accepted as a received fact. It is one of the principal semiotic components of the autonomous vehicle sociotechnical imaginary: if human drivers are responsible for ~90% of road crashes, autonomous vehicles should in principle be able to reduce road death and injury rates by a similar percentage. In this paper, it is argued that death and injury are not an aggregate of events that can be distributed across the three central variables of traditional road safety research: the driver, the vehicle, and the environment. The autonomous vehicle sociotechnical imaginary has embraced the central assumption of road safety research, that road violence is not an intrinsic property of automobility but is contingent because largely due to driver error. On the basis of this assumption it has been possible to configure autonomous vehicles as the solution to road violence. Although sociotechnical imaginaries are typically oriented towards the future, it is the significance of the autonomous vehicle sociotechnical imaginary in the present that is the focus of this paper. Autonomous vehicles are not the radically transformational technology their proponents claim but simply the most recent of a succession of automobility sociotechnical imaginaries. They are not transformational because their promotion ensures the continued reproduction of more of the same: namely, more automobility.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference109 articles.

1. Alonso Raposo M (2019) The future of road transport. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

2. Aptiv Services Us Llc, Audi Ag, Bayrische Motoren Werke Ag, Beijing Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co. L, Continental Teves Ag & Co Ohg, Daimler Ag, Fca Us Llc, Here Global B.V., Infineon Technologies Ag, Intel, Volkswagen Ag (2019) Safety first for automated driving. https://www.daimler.com/documents/innovation/other/safety-first-for-automated-driving.pdf

3. Ardente F, Aurambout J-P, Baldini G, Braun R, Christidis P, Christodoulou A, Duboz A, Felici S, Ferragut J, Georgakaki A, Gkoumas K, Grosso M, Iglesias M, Julea A, Krause J, Martens B, Mathieux F, Menzel G, Mondello S, Navajas Cawood E, Pekár F, Raileanu I-C, Scholz H, Tamba M, Tsakalidis A, Van Balen M, Vandecasteele IT (2019) The future of road transport—implications of automated, connected, low-carbon and shared mobility, Jrc116644. Center JR. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

4. Arendt H (1973) The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

5. Aristotle, Ross WD (1981) Aristotle’s metaphysics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Machines meet humans on the social road: Risk implications;Risk Analysis;2023-11-16

2. Our culturally maladaptive transport discourses are continuing to fail our children;Children's Geographies;2023-10-27

3. How does “over-hype” lead to public misconceptions about autonomous vehicles? A new insight applying causal inference;Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice;2023-09

4. Steering Stories;Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2023-04-19

5. Sicherheitsversprechen im Wandel;Risiko im Wandel;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3