Abstract
AbstractTo establish a “well-being economy” that prioritizes human and environmental welfare, understanding the relationship between income inequality, research and development (R&D) potential, and human development is crucial. This study delves into these relationships in European Union (EU) countries, focusing on the adoption levels of a circular economy (CE). Analyzing data from the 27 EU member countries spanning 2010 to 2020, a cluster analysis was utilized to categorize nations based on their CE adoption levels. The panel regression analysis findings revealed a marked positive correlation between income and R&D, with countries having a more robust CE adoption showing stronger ties. Furthermore, a notable positive link was discerned between R&D and human development indicators. Despite these significant relationships, the government R&D sector exhibited inefficiencies, especially in countries with heightened CE adoption. These findings carry profound implications for policymakers, urging a redefinition of economic growth metrics and a shift toward a well-being economy that emphasizes human and environmental health.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference106 articles.
1. Aghion P, Akcigit U, Bergeaud A, Blundell R, Hémous D (2019) Innovation and top income inequality. Rev Econ Stud 86:1–45
2. Aghion P, Griffith R (2022) Innovation and inequalities. Institute for Fiscal Studies. pp. 1–9
3. Akcali BY, Sismanoglu E (2015) Innovation and the effect of research and development (R&D) expenditure on growth in some developing and developed countries. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 195:768–775
4. Alshater MM, Atayah OF, Khan A (2022) What do we know about business and economics research during COVID-19: a bibliometric review. Econ Res-Ekon Istraž 35:1884–1912
5. Ameer W, Xu H, Sohag K, Halwan MM, Amin A (2022) Research methods in economics and its implications for capital formation. Econ Res-Ekon Istraž 35:5536–5555