Abstract
AbstractThis study presents a quantitative framework to analyze the engagement of four Asian sub-regions with global issues through their participation in multilateral treaties across various policy areas. The research addresses key questions regarding the speed of Asian states’ involvement in multilateral treaties and their adaptation to these treaties within the United Nations system over time. The approach combines empirical data and conceptualization to ensure a robust evidentiary basis. A dataset comprising 600 major multilateral treaties deposited in the United Nations system, covering diverse global issues, was collected. Additionally, ratification actions from twenty-eight Asian countries were categorized into four sub-regions: East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Central Asia. To quantitatively measure states’ engagement with multilateral treaties, the study developed and calculated the Treaty Participation Index for each Asian country and sub-group. In an area predominantly characterized by qualitative research, this paper contributes to the existing literature by providing quantitative and metric findings for comparative analyses of multilateral treaty participation among the four Asian sub-regions, as well as comparisons between Asia and the rest of the world. By analyzing the results, the paper offers an evidence-based assessment of the feasibility of these four regionalisms in Asia, particularly in the context of the transition from international politics to the paradigm of global politics.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference27 articles.
1. Barker JC (2004) Mechanisms To Create and Support Conventions, Treaties, and Other Responses. In: Kutting GabrielaMaria (Ed.) Conventions, Treaties and other Responses to Global Issues, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, p 32–56. https://www.eolss.net/outlinecomponents/conventions-treaties-responses-global-issues.aspx
2. Cajueiro DO, De Camargo RS (2006) Minority game with local interactions due to the presence of herding behavior. Phys Lett Sec. 355(4–5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2006.02.060
3. Denemark RA, Hoffmann MJ (2008) Just scraps of paper?: The dynamics of multilateral treaty-making. Cooperation Conflict 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836708089082
4. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J Econ Lit (40, 2). https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.351
5. Glas A, Van Der Linden C, Hoffmann MJ, Denemark RA (2018) Understanding Multilateral Treaty-Making as Constitutive Practice. J Glob Secur Stud 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy014
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献