How do cancer research scientists deal with machines and consumables? Exploring research ethics from an inductive ethnographic perspective

Author:

Mnasri SalaheddineORCID,Jaber Fadi

Abstract

AbstractThis paper started from an inductive ethnography conducted within a cancer research lab in Belgium. The primary objective was to explore how researchers make decisions and rationalize their scientific practices. Through data collected from participant observation, interviews, and analysis of research protocols, the study exposes serious knowledge gaps that compromise research ethics. Specifically, the findings reveal the scientists’ need for more understanding of the validity of their lab machines and the readymade consumables procured from external providers. Moreover, without questioning this dependency, our participants (scientists) rely heavily on machines and consumables for almost all their research protocols. The findings suggest that cancer researchers place unjustifiable trust in the lab’s machines and the external providers’ reliability; this compromises the following three fundamental ethical principles: research integrity, responsible conduct, and the responsibility of using resources and technologies.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. All European Academies (ALLEA) (2017) The European code of conduct for research integrity. ALLEA, Berlin. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct

2. Atkinson JM, Heritage J (1984) Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

3. Bærøe K, Kerasidou A, Dunn M, Teig IL (2022) Pursuing Impact in Research: Towards an Ethical Approach. BMC Med Ethics 23(1):37. 101186/s12910-022-00754-3

4. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2019) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

5. Besley JC, Dudo A, Yuan S, Lawrence F (2018) Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage. Sci Commun 40(5):559–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018786561

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3