How online discourse networks fields of practice: The discursive negotiation of autonomy on art organisation about pages

Author:

Soro Tommie

Abstract

AbstractThis article examines how the online discourse of art organisations forges relationships between the artworld and the fields of politics and economy. Combining elements of Pierre Bourdieu’s field analysis and Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis, the article analyses an elite art magazine, e-flux, and an elite art museum, IMMA, and the activities of discourses, genres, and utterances on their about pages. Its results suggest that the about pages of these organisations forge links between the artworld and the fields of politics and economy by mobilising discourse in these fields and by incorporating discourse practices from these fields. The ideological tension resulting from this interdiscursivity was found to be managed in different ways. The article thereby contributes to furthering our understanding of how discourse networks fields of practice.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference69 articles.

1. Afshar HS, Moradi M, Hamzavi R (2014) Frequency and type of hedging devices used in the research articles of humanities, basic sciences and agriculture. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 136:70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.290

2. Allen G (2011) Artists’ magazines: an alternative space for art. MIT Press

3. Angermuller J (2018) Accumulating discursive capital, valuating subject positions. From Marx to Foucault. Crit Discourse Stud 15(4 Aug):414–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1457551

4. Atkins R (2014) Everybody’s Art. Art in America. https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/everybodys-art-63008/

5. Barthes R and Heath S (1977) The death of the author. In: Image, Music, Text: Essays. 13. [Dr.]. London: Fontana, pp. 142–148

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3