Abstract
AbstractThis essay delves into the essentialities of object-giving sources within the formulation of epistemic objectivity. It explores the relationship between objectivity and intentional states, particularly in the context of immediate and transcendent experiences. A key focus of this paradigm is the examination of inferences and how they are held in X’s intentional processes. These claims about inferences contribute to the perception of objectivity by highlighting the epistemological transitions of things that occur in the constitutive ideation. Additionally, the activity within X’s episteme leads to significant articulations that reflect a structural realism of experiences. The essay also introduces a convention of the experiential-intentional process so that the causality manipulations could be avoided by the precents of sources of ideation. In this instance, the central niche is occupied by transcendental reflections of intentionality, which are fundamentally founded on experiences and objectivity, and they possess a distinct rhetorical quality. They manifest as acts, propositional forms, and constituents, all of which contribute to the understanding and justification of objectivity. To establish such a framework that upholds objectivity, certain prerequisites must be met. Firstly, the framework must possess justificational resources that prevent causality manipulations. Secondly, pre-reflective sources should not inter-define causality in epistemic circumstances, although this does not exclude the emergence of causal relations, and thus this approach offers a correlational explanation. Lastly, transcendental reflections should remain compatible with the experiential-intentional process, allowing for the accommodation of subjectivity in the justification of objectivity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference47 articles.
1. Alston WP (2005) Beyond “Justification”: dimensions of epistemic evaluation. Cornell University Press
2. Audi R (2001) The architecture of reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford
3. Berghofer P (2019) Husserl’s noetics—towards a phenomenological epistemology. J Br Soc Phenomenol 50(2):120–138
4. Bernet R (1988) Perception, categorical intuition, and Truth in Husserl’s Sixth ‘Logical Investigation’. In: Sallis JC, Moneta G, Taminiaux J (eds.) The collegium phaenomenologicum, The first ten years phaenomenologica, vol 105. Springer, Dordrecht
5. Boroditsky L (2011). How languages construct time. In Space, time and number in the brain (pp. 333–341). Academic Press