How to convince in a televised debate: the application of machine learning to analyze why viewers changed their winner perception during the 2021 German chancellor discussion

Author:

Ettensperger FelixORCID,Waldvogel ThomasORCID,Wagschal Uwe,Weishaupt Samuel

Abstract

AbstractWhat causes viewers to change their winner perception during a televised debate? The article addresses this question, drawing on a large-N field study of the 2021 chancellor debate in Germany, which contains survey and real-time response data for 4613 participants. Using machine learning techniques, we identify determinants of why participants change their opinion about who is winning the discussion during the debate. Our analysis based on random forest and decision tree models shows in detail, first, what factors drive debate winner perceptions in the course of televised debate reception. Second, we reveal what combinations of political predispositions and candidate statements are necessary to change the viewers’ debate winner perception. In doing so, third, we expand the toolbox of empirical debate research with our analysis based on machine learning algorithms. Our findings indicate that pre-debate chancellor preference and candidate images play a crucial role in determining post-debate perception change, while party identification is less important in predicting changes. We can also directly identify several speech moments in the debate that shifted viewer perception, a novel approach to evaluating political debate performance.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference64 articles.

1. Aalberg T, Jenssen AT (2007) Do television debates in multiparty systems affect viewers? A quasi-experimental study with first-time voters. Scand Political Stud 30(1):115–35

2. Alletsee M (2015) Informationsverarbeitung in TV-Duellen. Ein mikrofundierter Mehrebenen-Ansatz zur Analyse der Echtzeit-Reaktionen auf Kandidatenaussagen. Politische Psychol 4:275–291

3. Bachl M (2013) Die Wirkung des TV-Duells auf die Bewertung der Kandidaten und die Wahlabsicht. In: Bachl M, Brettschneider F, Ottler S (Hrsg) Das TV-Duell in Baden-Württemberg 2011. Inhalte, Wahrnehmungen und Wirkungen. Springer VS, pp. 171–198

4. Bachl M (2017) How attacks and defenses resonate with viewers’ political attitudes in televised debates. An empirical test of the resonance model of campaign effects. In: Schill D, Kirk R, Jasperson AE (Hrsg) Political communication in real time. Theoretical and applied research approaches. Routledge, pp. 225–248

5. Benoit WL, Hansen GJ, Verser RM (2003) A meta-analysis of the effects viewing U.S. Presidential Debates. Commun Monogr 70(4):335–350

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3