Abstract
AbstractWhat causes viewers to change their winner perception during a televised debate? The article addresses this question, drawing on a large-N field study of the 2021 chancellor debate in Germany, which contains survey and real-time response data for 4613 participants. Using machine learning techniques, we identify determinants of why participants change their opinion about who is winning the discussion during the debate. Our analysis based on random forest and decision tree models shows in detail, first, what factors drive debate winner perceptions in the course of televised debate reception. Second, we reveal what combinations of political predispositions and candidate statements are necessary to change the viewers’ debate winner perception. In doing so, third, we expand the toolbox of empirical debate research with our analysis based on machine learning algorithms. Our findings indicate that pre-debate chancellor preference and candidate images play a crucial role in determining post-debate perception change, while party identification is less important in predicting changes. We can also directly identify several speech moments in the debate that shifted viewer perception, a novel approach to evaluating political debate performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference64 articles.
1. Aalberg T, Jenssen AT (2007) Do television debates in multiparty systems affect viewers? A quasi-experimental study with first-time voters. Scand Political Stud 30(1):115–35
2. Alletsee M (2015) Informationsverarbeitung in TV-Duellen. Ein mikrofundierter Mehrebenen-Ansatz zur Analyse der Echtzeit-Reaktionen auf Kandidatenaussagen. Politische Psychol 4:275–291
3. Bachl M (2013) Die Wirkung des TV-Duells auf die Bewertung der Kandidaten und die Wahlabsicht. In: Bachl M, Brettschneider F, Ottler S (Hrsg) Das TV-Duell in Baden-Württemberg 2011. Inhalte, Wahrnehmungen und Wirkungen. Springer VS, pp. 171–198
4. Bachl M (2017) How attacks and defenses resonate with viewers’ political attitudes in televised debates. An empirical test of the resonance model of campaign effects. In: Schill D, Kirk R, Jasperson AE (Hrsg) Political communication in real time. Theoretical and applied research approaches. Routledge, pp. 225–248
5. Benoit WL, Hansen GJ, Verser RM (2003) A meta-analysis of the effects viewing U.S. Presidential Debates. Commun Monogr 70(4):335–350