Author:
Kelly Danielle,Teasdale Simon,Steiner Artur,Mason Helen
Abstract
Abstract
Recent policy focus is on the ‘non-obvious’ role of community-based organisations in tackling causes of poor health, such as social exclusion. Men’s Sheds are a type of community-based organisation offering health and wellbeing benefits to men, despite this not being the explicit reason they exist. A qualitative study was conducted in Scotland to identify sustainability challenges that impact on the ability of Sheds to become a formal healthcare service. Findings showed that a reliance on ageing and retired volunteers to undertake operational tasks and generate income to fund activities affected the ability of Sheds to sustain and develop. Further, members preferred their Sheds to remain informal and flexible to fit their specific needs. Although Sheds are recognised for their health and wellbeing benefits to men, policymakers must recognise that formalising their activities might detract from the Shed’s primary aims. This paper summarises specific policy implications and recommendations, taking into consideration tensions between the expectations placed on Sheds to expand into formal healthcare delivery, and the needs of Shed users.
Highlights:
Men’s Shed are known for their ability to contribute to men’s health and wellbeing.
The potential of Shed to take on a formal healthcare role is questionable because of a reliance on ageing and retired volunteers and a preference to remain informal.
Policymakers must recognise that although Sheds might be well placed to offer formal health care this may detract from their primary aims.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference32 articles.
1. Milton B, Attree P, French B, Povall S, Whitehead M, Popay J. The impact of community engagement on health and social outcomes: a systematic review. Commun Dev J. 2012;46(3):316–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsr043.
2. Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? WHO Regional Office for Europe Health Evidence Network Report, 2006. http://www.euro.who.int/document/E88086.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019.
3. Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social determinants of health: the solid facts. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
4. Buck D, and Wenzel L. Communities and health. The Kings Fund. 2018. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/communities-and-health Accessed 14 July 2019
5. Suchowerska R, Barraket J, Qian J, Mason C, Farmer J, Carey G. An organizational approach to understanding how social enterprises address health inequities: a scoping review. J Soc Entrepreneur. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1640771.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献