Abstract
AbstractFor decades, corporate undermining of scientific consensus has eroded the scientific process worldwide. Guardrails for protecting science-informed processes, from peer review to regulatory decision making, have suffered sustained attacks, damaging public trust in the scientific enterprise and its aim to serve the public good. Government efforts to address corporate attacks have been inadequate. Researchers have cataloged corporate malfeasance that harms people’s health across diverse industries. Well-known cases, like the tobacco industry’s efforts to downplay the dangers of smoking, are representative of transnational industries, rather than unique. This contribution schematizes industry tactics to distort, delay, or distract the public from instituting measures that improve health—tactics that comprise the “disinformation playbook.” Using a United States policy lens, we outline steps the scientific community should take to shield science from corporate interference, through individual actions (by scientists, peer reviewers, and editors) and collective initiatives (by research institutions, grant organizations, professional associations, and regulatory agencies).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference36 articles.
1. Michaels D. The Triumph of doubt: dark money and the science of deception. New York: Oxford University Press; 2020.
2. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2011.
3. McGarity TO, Wagner WE. Bending science: how special interests corrupt public health research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2008.
4. Markowitz G, Rosner D. Lead wars: the politics of science and the fate of America’s children. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2013.
5. Kearns CE, Glantz SA, Schmidt LA. Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the national institute of dental research’s 1971 national caries program: a historical analysis of internal documents. PLoS Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001798.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献