The disinformation playbook: how industry manipulates the science-policy process—and how to restore scientific integrity

Author:

Reed GennaORCID,Hendlin Yogi,Desikan Anita,MacKinney Taryn,Berman Emily,Goldman Gretchen T.

Abstract

AbstractFor decades, corporate undermining of scientific consensus has eroded the scientific process worldwide. Guardrails for protecting science-informed processes, from peer review to regulatory decision making, have suffered sustained attacks, damaging public trust in the scientific enterprise and its aim to serve the public good. Government efforts to address corporate attacks have been inadequate. Researchers have cataloged corporate malfeasance that harms people’s health across diverse industries. Well-known cases, like the tobacco industry’s efforts to downplay the dangers of smoking, are representative of transnational industries, rather than unique. This contribution schematizes industry tactics to distort, delay, or distract the public from instituting measures that improve health—tactics that comprise the “disinformation playbook.” Using a United States policy lens, we outline steps the scientific community should take to shield science from corporate interference, through individual actions (by scientists, peer reviewers, and editors) and collective initiatives (by research institutions, grant organizations, professional associations, and regulatory agencies).

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference36 articles.

1. Michaels D. The Triumph of doubt: dark money and the science of deception. New York: Oxford University Press; 2020.

2. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2011.

3. McGarity TO, Wagner WE. Bending science: how special interests corrupt public health research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2008.

4. Markowitz G, Rosner D. Lead wars: the politics of science and the fate of America’s children. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2013.

5. Kearns CE, Glantz SA, Schmidt LA. Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the national institute of dental research’s 1971 national caries program: a historical analysis of internal documents. PLoS Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001798.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3