Author:
Hayman Chloe-Marie,Stubbings Daniel Robert,Davies Joseph Lloyd,Payne Libby
Abstract
AbstractThis paper explored the novel use of an educational tool to assess its influence on County Lines victimisation. Participants (n = 122) were randomly assigned to receive either County Lines education or no County Lines education and then, rate their likelihood to engage in five hypothetical scenarios typical of County Lines victimisation verses a text scam. County Lines education did not significantly reduce participant willingness to engage in the scenarios, whilst most participants were not susceptible to a text scam. Demographic data, drug use, social isolation, poor mental health, and financial instability were weak predictors of engagement. Findings suggest that the public may be vulnerable to victimisation and that future research should continue to explore the role that education can have in reducing the likelihood of engaging in County Lines activity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Arlinghaus, K.R., and C.A. Johnson. 2017. Advocating for behaviour change with education. Behavioral Medicine Review 12 (2): 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827617745479.
2. Arnold, K., and K. McDermott. 2013. Free recall enhances subsequent learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20 (3): 507–513. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0370-3.
3. Barter, C., and E. Renold. 1999. The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update 25: 1–4.
4. Bell, M. and Bell, M. (1987). Crime control: Deterrence and target hardening. Handbook on crime and delinquency prevention, pp. 45–68.
5. Brewster, B., G. Robinson, B.W. Silverman, and D. Walsh. 2021. Covid-19 and child criminal exploitation in the UK: Implications of the pandemic for county lines. Trends in Organized Crime. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-021-09442-x.