Abstract
AbstractAfter a recent spate of terrorist attacks in European and American cities, liberal democracies are reintroducing emergency securitarian measures (ESMs) that curtail rights and/or expand police powers. Political theorists who study ESMs are familiar with how such measures become instruments of discrimination and abuse, but the fundamental conflict ESMs pose for not just civil liberty but also democratic equality still remains insufficiently explored. Such phenomena are usually explained as a function of public panic or fear-mongering in times of crisis, but I show that the tension between security and equality is in fact much deeper and more general. It follows a different logic than the more familiar tension between security and liberty, and it concerns not just the rule of law in protecting liberty but also the role of law in integrating new or previously subjected groups into a democratic community. As liberal-democratic societies become increasingly diverse and multicultural in the present era of mass immigration and global interconnectedness, this tension between security and equality is likely to become more pronounced.
Funder
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference71 articles.
1. Ackerman, B. (2006) Before the Next Attack: Preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception, trans. K. Attell. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
3. Amnesty International. (2016) Upturned Lives: The Disproportionate Impact of France’s State of Emergency, 3 February (EUR 12/3364/2016).
4. Amnesty International. (2017) Dangerously Disproportionate: The Ever-Expanding National Security State in Europe, 17 January (EUR 01/5342/2017).
5. Anderson, E. (1999) What is the point of equality? Ethics 109(2): 287–337.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献