Abstract
AbstractHow can the world be improved if the people inhabiting it do not believe they can transform it? A belief in such political fatalism is an important obstacle to social transformation, yet underexplored in the contemporary political theory literature. Political fatalism can be understood as a commitment to the belief that human agency cannot effectuate social transformation. In this article, I provide a typology of such political fatalism, considering its two main forms: fatalism of inevitability as the positive version that humans do not have the power to affect positive social change, and fatalism of impossibility as the negative version that human agency does not play a role in avoiding negative social change such as climate catastrophe. Focussing particularly on the more pressing contemporary problem of the fatalism of impossibility, I develop three distinct dimensions along which fatalism has an impact: the cognitive, the affective, and the practical. Finally, I offer solutions, focussing on how to combine interventions on the cognitive, affective, and practical levels: historically sensitive critique, imagination, and a combination of bounded spontaneism and long-term political organisation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Acevedo, G. A. (2008). Islamic fatalism and the clash of civilizations: An appraisal of a contentious and dubious theory. Social Forces, 86, 1711–1752.
2. Aravamudan, S. (2013). The catachronism of climate change. Diacritics, 41, 6–30.
3. Barker, C. (2001). Fear, laughter, and collective power: The making of solidarity at the Lenin Shipyard in Gdansk, Poland, August 1980. In J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. University of Chicago Press.
4. Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. Schocken.
5. Bernstein, M. (2005). Fatalism. In R. Kane (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press.