The Relevance of the Cambridge–Cambridge Controversies in Capital Theory for Econometric Practice (2007)
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Reference60 articles.
1. Arrow, K. J., H. B. Chenery, B. S. Minhas and R. M. Solow (1961), ‘Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 43, 225–50.
2. Bliss, C. J. (1975), Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
3. Byron, R. P. (1970a), ‘The Bias in the Watson–Harcourt–Praetz Variant of the C.E.T. Production Frontier’, Economic Record, 46, 567–73.
4. Byron, R. P. (1970b), ‘A Reply to the Trinity’, Economic Record, 46, 576–77.
5. Cohen, A. J. and G. C. Harcourt (2003), ‘Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 199–214.