Using go-it-alone power to overcome intergovernmental deadlock: national vetoes, credible threats, and multi-speed Europe in the British budgetary rebate crisis

Author:

Schramm LucasORCID

Abstract

AbstractDifferentiated integration, and the prospect thereof, is a prominent feature of European integration and policymaking. This article theorizes and demonstrates an explicit link between the threat of differentiated integration and the resolution of major European integration crises. Based on archival sources and secondary literature on differentiated integration, it shows how and why, in June 1984, the United Kingdom and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher agreed to increase the European Community’s (EC) financial resources, despite their years-long insistence on budgetary restraint and their formal right to veto such a decision. The article argues that the prospect of a ‘multi-speed’ Europe, represented by Franco-German ‘go-it-alone’ power, threatened to exclude recalcitrant member states. Lacking more promising alternatives to continued membership in a reformed EC, the British government consented to European financial objectives. It also joined the other national governments towards deeper political integration and, eventually, a European Union, despite its actual rejection of European federal ambitions. The article’s theoretical expectations and empirical findings on ways to overcome intergovernmental deadlock based on formal national veto rights have broader implications also for more recent European integration crises.

Funder

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference50 articles.

1. Beach, Derek, and Rasmus B. Pedersen. 2019. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

2. Biermann, Felix. 2023. The Differentiation Paradox of European Integration: Why Going It Alone Produces Suboptimal Results. Journal of Common Market Studies 61 (2): 344–361.

3. Bulletin. 1981. Bulletin of the European Communities 14(11), 1981. http://aei.pitt.edu/65375/

4. Bulletin. 1983. Bulletin of the European Communities 16(6), 1983. http://aei.pitt.edu/65280/

5. Bulletin. 1984a. Bulletin of the European Communities 17(5), 1984. http://aei.pitt.edu/65290/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3