Author:
Blauberger Michael,Heindlmaier Anita,Kobler Carina
Abstract
AbstractThis paper traces the political debate about the export and the indexation of family benefits in the European Union (EU). We ask why such a technical legal issue has become salient in several EU member states. Explanations building on financial and political justifications prove to be insufficient. Rather, we argue, indexation has to be understood in the broader context of the contestation and constitutionalization of the free movement of workers. Free movement and equal treatment of workers have become contested with Eastern enlargement, but their legal framework is largely removed from political adjustments as it is constitutionalized in the Treaties and progressively interpreted by the Court of Justice (CJEU). At least symbolically, indexation promises to address these economic and legal challenges and serves as an “outlet” for member state governments. We illustrate our argument with empirical evidence from the debates preceding the Brexit referendum and the Austrian reform of family benefits.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference39 articles.
1. Afonso, A. 2012. Employer Strategies, Cross-Class Coalitions and the Free Movement of Labour in the Enlarged European Union. Socio-Economic Review 10(4): 705–730.
2. Alcidi, C., and D. Gros. 2019. EU Mobile Workers: A Challenge to Public Finances?. https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/EU%20Mobile%20Workers.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2020.
3. Blanchflower, D.G., and H. Lawton. 2009. The Impact of the Recent Expansion of the EU on the UK Labor Market. In EU Labor Markets After Post-Enlargement Migration, ed. M. Kahanec and K.F. Zimmermann, 181–218. Berlin: Springer.
4. Blauberger, M. 2012. With Luxembourg in Mind … The Remaking of National Policies in the Face of ECJ Jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 109–126.
5. Blauberger, M., A. Heindlmaier, D. Kramer, et al. 2018. ECJ Judges Read the Morning Papers. Explaining the Turnaround of European Citizenship Jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy 25(10): 1422–1441.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献