Coordinative Europeanization as a response to crisis: what lessons from the RRF for future EU cohesion policy?

Author:

Polverari LauraORCID

Abstract

AbstractA considerable amount of literature has been devoted to analysing the genesis, rationale and modus operandi of the NGEU and RRF. However, not much attention has been paid to the practical implications of the RRF, and potential lesson-drawing, for established EU policies. EU cohesion policy is particularly salient in this respect, given the RRF’s general objective of contributing to economic, social and territorial cohesion and the current discussions about the RRF serving as a model for future cohesion policy, to improve the policy’s effectiveness, rationalise spending in view of future enlargements and better tie EU funding with reforms. Starting with a comparison between the delivery arrangements of EU cohesion policy and of the RRF, the study identifies and tests four expectations about their timing and absorption, possible displacement effects, administrative burden, and the impacts to be achieved, and tackles the following research questions: is it realistic to expect the RRF and cohesion policy to work synergistically, given the diversity in their delivery arrangements? Is the RRF proving sufficiently effective and simple, to represent a good model for future EU cohesion policy? Could the coordinative Europeanization that is typical of the RRF be a viable decision-making and implementation mode beyond emergency?

Funder

Università degli Studi di Padova

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. Angelou, A. 2024. Linking crises: inter-crisis learning and the European Commission’s approach to the National Recovery and Resilience Plans, in this issue.

2. Bachtler, J., I. Begg, D. Charles, and L. Polverari. 2016. EU Cohesion policy in practice: what does it achieve? London: Rowman and Littlefield Int.

3. Bachtler, J., and C. Mendez. 2020. Cohesion and the EU budget: is conditionality undermining solidarity? In Governance and politics in the post-crisis Union, ed. R. Coman, A. Crespy, and V.A. Schmidt, 121–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Bachtler, J., C. Mendez, and F. Wishlade. 2020. Will cohesion policy recover from COVID? An initial assessment, European Regional Policy Research Consortium Paper 20/3, European Policies Research Centre. https://eprc-strath.org/publication/will-cp-recover-from-covid/

5. Bressanelli, E., and D. Natali. 2024. Europeanisation in the aftermath of Covid-19 in Italy: understanding the organisational adaptation of the central governance of the NRRP, in this issue.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3