Abstract
AbstractThe comparative study of intraparty divisions and their determinants has been a long-debated matter, but some issues remain unresolved. First, the problem of the empirical identification of intraparty groups. Second, the lack of comparative perspective and large-N cross-country and cross-time analyses, given intraparty divisions have been studied mostly through theoretical or, at best, small-N analyses. Third, the underestimation of the potential role exerted by contextual factors because of the emphasis put almost exclusively on intraparty dynamics. To fill these gaps, the article employs a measure of visible intraparty fractionalization allowing for large-N cross-time and cross-country comparison. Moreover, by focusing on about 700 party cases in 11 Western European countries since 1965, the article shows that institutional factors, particularly electoral systems’ characteristics, impact intraparty fractionalization. Specifically, intraparty fractionalization is higher in more disproportional systems and where there are stronger incentives for personal vote.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference100 articles.
1. Allern, E.H., and R. Karlsen. 2014. Unanimous by acclamation? Party leadership selection in Norway. In The selection of political party leaders in contemporary parliamentary democracies, ed. J.-B. Pilet and W.P. Cross, 47–61. Abingdon: Routledge.
2. André, A., S. Depauw, and S. Martin. 2016. The classification of electoral systems: Bringing legislators back in. Electoral Studies 42: 42–53.
3. Balmas, M., G. Rahat, T. Sheafer, and S.R. Shenhav. 2014. Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics 20 (1): 37–51.
4. Beck, N. and Katz, J.N. 1995. What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3) 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
5. Beck, N. and Katz, J.N. 2004. Time-Series–Cross-Section Issues: Dynamics. Draft paper.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献