Author:
Nordström Laura,Laiho Niilo
Abstract
AbstractThe IMF’s 2010 Troika lending programme with Greece was unprecedented due to the IMF’s controversial internal rule changes, the programme’s pivotal effects on eurozone crisis policies and the effect of austerity concepts on Greece. We aim to explain conclusively why the IMF lent to Greece without restructuring, as previous explanations have crucial gaps. We operationalise Ben Clift’s theory of IMF behaviour in process-tracing, analysing programme-related text sources. Our exercise is novel as Clift does not aim to explain individual programmes, while the theory warrants further testing. According to our causal mechanism, the IMF used two key analytical lenses formed via bricolage, fiscal space and nonlinear multiple equilibria processes (NLMEP), to analyse the programme context and formulate the programme design. While we find our mechanism too narrow to explain the programme design, our results regarding the role of NLMEP and fiscal space within IMF programme-time economic analysis support the importance of financial contagion as a motivator for monetarily significant IMF participation and why the IMF adhered to austerity despite risking debt stabilisation. However, it seems limitedly useful to assume coherent ideational drivers behind the precise programme design: instead, accepting the key role of ad hoc judgement depicts IMF behaviour accurately.
Funder
University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference54 articles.
1. Ban, C. 2015. Austerity Versus Stimulus? Understanding Fiscal Policy Change at the International Monetary Fund Since the Great Recession. Governance 28(2): 167–183.
2. Ban, C. 2020. Ben Clift’s The IMF and the Politics of Austerity. Comparative European Politics 18(1): 78–84.
3. Bastasin, C. 2012. Saving Europe: Anatomy of a Dream. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Beach, D., and R. Pedersen. 2012. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5. Bennett, A. 2015. Appendix: Disciplining Our Conjectures: Systematizing Process Tracing with Bayesian Analysis. In Process tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Strategies for Social Inquiry, ed. A. Bennett and J.T. Checkel, 276–298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献