1. Quentin Skinner, “The State,” in Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, ed. Terence Ball, James Farr, and Russell L. Hanson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 90–131.
2. John Adolphus, ed., A correct, full, and impartial report, of the trial of Her Majesty Caroline, Queen Consort of Great Britain, before the House of Peers, on the bill of pains and penalties: with authentic particulars, embracing every circumstance connected with, and illustrative of, the subject of this momentous event interspersed with original letters, and other curious and interesting documents, not generally known, and never before published, including, at large, Her Majesty’s defence (Buffalo, NY: Hein, 2001), 221.
3. See also Dror Wahrman, “Public Opinion, Violence, and the Limits of Constitutional Politics,” in Re-Reading the Constitution, ed. James Vernon (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 83–122.
4. Adam Tomkins, “The Republican Monarchy Revisited,” Constitutional Comment 19 (2002): 737.
5. See A. V. Dicey, Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1981);