1. For data on sources and uses of rural household income, see Statisticheskii biulleten’, no. 1 (March 1999); ibid, no. 1 (January 2000); David J. O’Brien, Valeri V. Patsiorkovski, and Larry D. Dershem, Household Capital and the Agrarian Problem in Russia (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), chap. 8; Dokhody, raskhody, i potreblenie domashnikh khoziaistv v III–IV kvartalakh 2000 goda (Moscow: Goskomstat, 2001); Dokhody raskhody i potreblenie domashnikh khoziaistv v I–IV kvartalakh 2001 goda (Moscow: Goskomstat, 2002); Dokhody, raskhody, i potreblenie domashnikh khoziaistv v 2002 godu (Moscow: Goskomstat, 2003);
2. and David J. O’ Brien, Stephen K. Wegren, and Valeri V. Patsiorkokvski, “Contemporary Rural Responses to Reform from Above,” The Russian Review, vol. 63, no. 2 (April 2004), pp. 256–76.
3. Gregory Ioffe and Tatyana Nefedova, Continuity and Change in Rural Russia: A Geographical Perspective (Boulder: Westview Press, 1997), chap. 12.
4. Although influential, the moral economy argument is controversial. For an alternative view, see Robert H. Bates, “Lessons from History, or the Perfidy of English Exceptionalism and the Significance of Historical France,” World Politics, vol. XL, no. 4 (July 1988), pp. 499–516;
5. Thomas Clay Arnold, “Rethinking Moral Economy,” American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 1 (March 2001), pp. 85–95.