Author:
Evenett Simon J.,Pisani Niccolò
Abstract
AbstractHow foreign firms doing business in Russia responded to the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has received extensive media scrutiny. Publication lags in official and private databases on international corporate activity, traditionally used to investigate cross-national commercial ties, preclude short-term assessments of foreign firms’ responses. However, as geopolitical events unfold quickly, such assessments can offer valuable insights. In this paper, we advocate for and implement a replicable, near-time methodology that is executed at arms-length to track foreign corporate responses to geopolitical events which can inform both academic debate and policy deliberation. We apply it to the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict, estimating Western corporate divestment rates from Russia during the first 9 months of the conflict. Our findings, confirmed by extensive robustness checks, result in divestment rates in the range of 5–13%. This range is interpreted in light of the prevailing sanctions regime as well as the divestment rate witnessed after Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014. We also discuss the competing, often policy-induced, incentives facing international business during a time of growing geopolitical rivalry and draw implications for the design of sanctions regimes. Avenues for future research are also outlined.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Business and International Management
Reference37 articles.
1. Aggarwal, V. K., & Reddie, A. W. 2021. Economic statecraft in the 21st century: Implications for the future of the global trade regime. World Trade Review, 20(2): 137–151.
2. Bajgar, M., Berlingieri, G., Calligaris, S., Criscuolo, C., & Timmis, J. 2020. Coverage and representativeness of Orbis data. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2020/06.
3. Baldwin, D. A. 2020. Economic statecraft. Princeton University Press.
4. Bekkers, E., & Goes, C. 2022. The impact of geopolitical conflicts on trade, growth, and innovation. UC San Diego & World Trade Organization Working Paper, No. ERSD-2022-09.
5. Biglaiser, G., & Lektzian, D. 2011. The effect of sanctions on U.S. foreign direct investment. International Organization, 65(3): 531–551.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献