Geopolitics, conflict, and decoupling: evidence of Western divestment from Russia during 2022

Author:

Evenett Simon J.,Pisani Niccolò

Abstract

AbstractHow foreign firms doing business in Russia responded to the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has received extensive media scrutiny. Publication lags in official and private databases on international corporate activity, traditionally used to investigate cross-national commercial ties, preclude short-term assessments of foreign firms’ responses. However, as geopolitical events unfold quickly, such assessments can offer valuable insights. In this paper, we advocate for and implement a replicable, near-time methodology that is executed at arms-length to track foreign corporate responses to geopolitical events which can inform both academic debate and policy deliberation. We apply it to the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict, estimating Western corporate divestment rates from Russia during the first 9 months of the conflict. Our findings, confirmed by extensive robustness checks, result in divestment rates in the range of 5–13%. This range is interpreted in light of the prevailing sanctions regime as well as the divestment rate witnessed after Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014. We also discuss the competing, often policy-induced, incentives facing international business during a time of growing geopolitical rivalry and draw implications for the design of sanctions regimes. Avenues for future research are also outlined.

Funder

University of St.Gallen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Business and International Management

Reference37 articles.

1. Aggarwal, V. K., & Reddie, A. W. 2021. Economic statecraft in the 21st century: Implications for the future of the global trade regime. World Trade Review, 20(2): 137–151.

2. Bajgar, M., Berlingieri, G., Calligaris, S., Criscuolo, C., & Timmis, J. 2020. Coverage and representativeness of Orbis data. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2020/06.

3. Baldwin, D. A. 2020. Economic statecraft. Princeton University Press.

4. Bekkers, E., & Goes, C. 2022. The impact of geopolitical conflicts on trade, growth, and innovation. UC San Diego & World Trade Organization Working Paper, No. ERSD-2022-09.

5. Biglaiser, G., & Lektzian, D. 2011. The effect of sanctions on U.S. foreign direct investment. International Organization, 65(3): 531–551.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3