Author:
Horváthová Brigitte,Dobbins Michael,Labanino Rafael Pablo
Abstract
AbstractThis paper contributes to our understanding of interest intermediation structures in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and, specifically, whether, which, how and to what extent organized interests are incorporated into policy-making processes. Unlike previous studies primarily focusing on patterns of economic coordination (Jahn 2016), we focus on energy policy-making in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia. We address the extent to which these energy interest intermediation systems are gravitating towards a more corporatist policy-making paradigm and whether corporatist arrangements have been dismantled in view of the new wave of national conservatism in CEE. We offer a complex operationalization of corporatism based on concrete indicators and present the results of a survey of energy interest groups operating in the region. It covers questions regarding interest intermediation between the organized interests and the government, regulatory authorities as well as the degree of policy coordination and political exchange with the state and between rivalling organizations, enabling us to derive a “corporatism score” for each national institutional setting and discuss them in the light of Jahn’s (2016) corporatism rankings for the region. We show that—despite striking differences—at least rudimentary corporatist interest intermediation structures have emerged with some variations of pluralism and statism in all four countries.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universität Konstanz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference58 articles.
1. Aalto, Pami, Heino Nyyssönen, Matti Kojo, and Pallavi Pal. 2017. Russian nuclear energy diplomacy in Finland and Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics 58 (4): 386–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1396905.
2. Avdagic, S. 2005. State-labour relations in east central Europe: explaining variations in union effectiveness. Socio-Economic Review 3 (1): 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/SER/mwh012.
3. Avdagic, Sabina, and Colin Crouch. 2006. “Organized Economic Interests: Diversity and Change in an Enlarged Europe.” Developments in European politics, 196–215.
4. Binhack, Petr, and Lukáš Tichý. 2012. Asymmetric Interdependence in the Czech-Russian Energy relations. Energy Policy 45: 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.027.
5. Bohle, Dorothee, and Béla Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe's Periphery: Cornell University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献