Abstract
AbstractThis article argues that the social policy influence of marginalised groups is at risk of being underestimated, in the scholarship, policy communities and wider society. It proposes the 3i instrument: a new, triangulated approach to measuring influence with a broader set of indicators than usually attempted. These indicators, which are designed to include influence in its early stages, are explored through a case study of autistic self-advocates in England. Surprisingly, the results show not just that autistic self-advocates but, through them, the wider autistic community, have more policy influence than they or others expect, but that influence is also being missed in its later stages, indicating that researcher bias may also be a complicating factor. While a single case of ‘missed’ influence is not sufficient to generalise to other contexts and groups, this research opens the door to a wider methodological discussion and reflexivity on the part of researchers.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference103 articles.
1. Aberbach, J.D., and B.A. Rockman. 2002. Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics 35: 673–676.
2. Arts, B., and P. Verschuren. 1999. Assessing political influence in complex decision-making: An instrument based on triangulation. International Political Science Review 20: 411–424.
3. Baker, D.L. 2011. The politics of neurodiversity. Boulder: Lynn Riener Press.
4. Banducci, S.A., T. Donovan, and J.A. Karp. 2004. Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. The Journal of Politics 66: 534–556.
5. Baranger, A., H. Hammersley, and M. Posada de la Paz. 2018 ASDEU workpackage 4: Assessment of member states’autism policies. https://www.autismeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ASDEU_State-of-the-art-autism-policies.pdf.