The game of goodwill: an exploratory study of discursive goodwill strategies of interest organizations in a consensus democracy

Author:

Ihlen ØyvindORCID,Raknes Ketil

Abstract

AbstractIn consensus democracies, interest organizations are likely to pursue their goals by attempting to create goodwill to strengthen their relationships with politicians. Through an exploratory analysis based on interviews with representatives from 58 organizations, a typology of seven strategies for such goodwill is suggested: Lobbyists will convey an understanding of the politician’s professional needs, while also recognizing constraints for what is possible to achieve. Several interviewees maintained that they avoided coming across as self-centered. Instead, they would be on the lookout for the politician’s interests, express empathy, provide public recognition of the politicians when ‘deserved,’ and they would keep a friendly and respectful tone. The first two of these strategies—emphasizing professional needs and recognizing constraints—were mentioned most frequently. The NGOs in the sample pointed to constraints more often than the other organization types, while the work-life organizations stated the importance of understanding professional needs the most. The use of such strategies increased with the level of organizational resources.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference63 articles.

1. Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2017. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.

2. Aristotle. (trans. 1996). The Nicomachean ethics (H. Rackham, Trans.). London: Wordsworth.

3. Aristotle. (trans. 2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans. 2 ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

4. Baumgartner, F.R., J.M. Berry, M. Hojnacki, D.C. Kimball, and B.L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

5. Berkhout, J. 2013. Why interest organizations do what they do: Assessing the explanatory potential of ‘exchange’ approaches. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 (2): 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.6.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Lobbyists and Their Obligation to the Public Interest;Political Science Quarterly;2024-06-13

2. The dynamics of dominance and compromise;DECISION;2024-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3