Theories and Realities of Global Wealth and Power-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Theories and Realities of Global Wealth and Power

Published:2010 Issue: Volume: Page:7-28
ISSN:
Container-title:Globalization, Wealth, and Power in the Twenty-First Century
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Nester William R.

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan US

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9780230117402_2

Reference77 articles.

1. For excellent overviews, see Robert Rothstein, ed., The Evolution of Theory in International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991); Charles Kegley, ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995); Robert Jackson and Georg Sorenson, Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly et al., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001); James Dougherty and Robert Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations (New York: Addison-Wesley-Longman, 2001); Colin Elman and Miriam Elman, eds., Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003; Yale Ferguson and Richard Mansbach, The Elusive Quest Continuities: Theory and Global Politics (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2003); Marc Genest, Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, 2004); Zeev Maoz et al., eds., Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 2004); Cynthia Weber, International Relations Theory (New York: Routledge, 2005); Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 2006).

2. For excellent overviews, see Robert Rothstein, ed., The Evolution of Theory in International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991); Charles Kegley, ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995); Robert Jackson and Georg Sorenson, Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly et al., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001); James Dougherty and Robert Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations (New York: Addison-Wesley-Longman, 2001); Colin Elman and Miriam Elman, eds., Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003; Yale Ferguson and Richard Mansbach, The Elusive Quest Continuities: Theory and Global Politics (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2003); Marc Genest, Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, 2004); Zeev Maoz et al., eds., Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 2004); Cynthia Weber, International Relations Theory (New York: Routledge, 2005); Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 2006).

3. For excellent overviews, see Robert Rothstein, ed., The Evolution of Theory in International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991); Charles Kegley, ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995); Robert Jackson and Georg Sorenson, Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly et al., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001); James Dougherty and Robert Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations (New York: Addison-Wesley-Longman, 2001); Colin Elman and Miriam Elman, eds., Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003; Yale Ferguson and Richard Mansbach, The Elusive Quest Continuities: Theory and Global Politics (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2003); Marc Genest, Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, 2004); Zeev Maoz et al., eds., Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 2004); Cynthia Weber, International Relations Theory (New York: Routledge, 2005); Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 2006).

4. For excellent overviews, see Robert Rothstein, ed., The Evolution of Theory in International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991); Charles Kegley, ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995); Robert Jackson and Georg Sorenson, Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly et al., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001); James Dougherty and Robert Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations (New York: Addison-Wesley-Longman, 2001); Colin Elman and Miriam Elman, eds., Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003; Yale Ferguson and Richard Mansbach, The Elusive Quest Continuities: Theory and Global Politics (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2003); Marc Genest, Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, 2004); Zeev Maoz et al., eds., Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 2004); Cynthia Weber, International Relations Theory (New York: Routledge, 2005); Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 2006).

5. For excellent overviews, see Robert Rothstein, ed., The Evolution of Theory in International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991); Charles Kegley, ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995); Robert Jackson and Georg Sorenson, Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly et al., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001); James Dougherty and Robert Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations (New York: Addison-Wesley-Longman, 2001); Colin Elman and Miriam Elman, eds., Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003; Yale Ferguson and Richard Mansbach, The Elusive Quest Continuities: Theory and Global Politics (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2003); Marc Genest, Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, 2004); Zeev Maoz et al., eds., Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 2004); Cynthia Weber, International Relations Theory (New York: Routledge, 2005); Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 2006).