Abstract
AbstractScholars have long investigated connections between types of knowledge use and types of policy subsystem. Yet, most of them focus on the learning function of expert information. The legitimizing function of knowledge—when expertise serves as a substitute for decision (Boswell in J Eur Public Policy 15(4):471–488, 2008)—has attracted less attention. An empirically validated explanation of this function is still missing. This article tests existing hypotheses regarding which features of the subsystem are conducive to the legitimizing function. The demonstration rests upon a case study: France’s Ministry of Agriculture’s commissioning of INRA to carry out a systematic literature review on pain in farm animals. Two types of factors are involved in the legitimizing function of knowledge: environmental mechanisms (an adversarial policy subsystem, concentration of policy authority) and relational mechanisms (coalitions displaying epistemic uncertainty and exerting pressures on the source of policy authority, a policy broker mitigating the conflict between the two coalitions).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bédard, P.O., and M. Ouimet. 2017. Awareness and Use of Systematic Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses by Ministerial Policy Analysts. Canadian Public Administration 60 (2): 173–191.
3. Blatter, J., and M. Haverland. 2012. Designing Case Studies. Exploratory Approaches in Small-n Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Boswell, C. 2008. The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (4): 471–488.
5. Brunsson, N. 2002. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Copenhagen: Abstrakt and Liber.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献