1. Thomas A. Bailey, Woodrow Wilson and the Great Betrayal (New York: Macmillan, 1943), 145, 173, 243, 277.
2. Sigmund Freud and William C. Bullitt, Thomas Woodrow Wilson: A Psychological Study (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966), 261, 281–3, 289, 291.
3. For a condensed version of this study, see Sigmund Freud and W. C. Bullitt, “Woodrow Wilson (I),” Encounter 28 (Jan. 1967): 3–24, and “Woodrow Wilson (II),” ibid., 28 (Feb. 1967): 3–24.
4. Freud and Bullitt, Thomas Woodrow Wilson, 259, 263–4. For an alternative, and much more realistic, interpretation of Wilson’s role during the peace conference, see Klaus Schwabe, Woodrow Wilson, Revolutionary Germany, and Peacemaking, 1918–1919: Missionary Diplomacy and the Realities of Power (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985).
5. Other factual errors are outlined by Arthur S. Link, “The Case for Woodrow Wilson,” in The Higher Realism of Woodrow Wilson and Other Essays (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1971), 140–54.