Abstract
AbstractThis article presents an original account of the strategic options available to political parties in the form of the position, salience and rhetoric framework. It builds upon existing accounts of party competition by conceiving of rhetorical justification as a distinct tool in the armoury of party strategists alongside the manipulation of policy position and issue salience. It applies that framework to the case of post-devolution Scotland via a quantitative text analysis of the written record of First Ministers Questions sessions in the Scottish Parliament. It shows how the main political parties in Scotland between them utilised all of the strategic tools contained within the PSR framework in the early twenty-first century up to the most recent 2021 election to the Holyrood parliament. It argues that the tactical choices the main Scottish parties made within this framework can help explain the differing electoral fortunes experienced by those parties in the post-devolution era.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Bayley, P. 2004. The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. P. Bayley, 1–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Bergman, M.E., and H. Flatt. 2020. Issue Diversification: Which Niche Parties Can Succeed Electorally by Broadening Their Agenda? Political Studies 68 (3): 710–730.
3. Bholat, D., S. Hansen, P. Santos, and C. Schonhardt-Bailey. 2015. Text Mining for Central Banks, Central Banking Studies Handbook Number 33. London: Bank of England.
4. Carman, C., R. Johns, and J. Mitchell. 2014. More Scottish than British: The 2011 Scottish Parliament Election. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. De Saint-Laurent, C. 2015. I Would Rather Be Hanged Than Agree with You!’: Collective Memory and the Definition of the Nation in Parliamentary Debates on Immigration. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 15 (3): 22–53.