Abstract
AbstractAccording to Rodrick, there is a globalization paradox between democracy, national sovereignty, and economic integration where only two out of these three can ever be achieved. Brexit was presented by its defenders as a way of resolving the trilemma. This contribution uses a novel survey (n = 95) to examine how UK businesses assess the new Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the UK and the EU and which model of trade they prefer moving forward. The findings by and large confirm expectations. First, the large majority considered that Brexit has had a negative impact on their businesses, including Leave voters. Second, and as regards sovereignty, the majority of Leavers thought labour shortages are a price worth paying for being able to limit freedom of movement as well as preferred to decrease EU regulations in their business sector. Third, economic integration seems to weigh heavier than concerns about sovereignty. Those who consider that Brexit had a negative financial impact on their business, including Leavers, now prefer a closer future relationship between the EU and the UK.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference54 articles.
1. Albone, J., and R. Klahr. 2020. Captains of Industry. In Ipsos. Ipsos Mori. https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/captains-of-industry-survey.
2. Arcangeli, F., and K. Liu. 2019. Executive Survey 2019: manufacturers’ expectations for the year ahead. In Make UK. Make UK and AIG. https://www.makeuk.org/insights/reports/executive-survey-2019.
3. Bellamy, R. 2019. A Republican Europe of States: Cosmopolitanism, intergovernmentalism and democracy in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Best for Britain. 2023. New attitudes poll: Voters want relationship with Europe, 28 May 2023. https://www.bestforbritain.org/brexit_attitudes_poll. Accessed 1 July 2023.
5. Birkinshaw, P. 2021. Brexit and the trade and cooperation agreement: Endgame or prolegomenon? European Public Law 27 (2): 229–264.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献