Measuring Effectiveness of Graph Visualizations: A Cognitive Load Perspective

Author:

Huang Weidong1,Eades Peter2,Hong Seok-Hee2

Affiliation:

1. National and International Surveys Program, Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, VIC 3124, Australia

2. School of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Abstract

Graph visualizations are typically evaluated by comparing their differences in effectiveness, measured by task performance such as response time and accuracy. Such performance-based measures have proved to be useful in their own right. There are some situations, however, where the performance measures alone may not be sensitive enough to detect differences. This limitation can be seen from the fact that the graph viewer may achieve the same level of performance by devoting different amounts of cognitive effort. In addition, it is not often that individual performance measures are consistently in favor of a particular visualization. This makes design and evaluation difficult in choosing one visualization over another. In an attempt to overcome the above-mentioned limitations, we measure the effectiveness of graph visualizations from a cognitive load perspective. Human memory as an information processing system and recent results from cognitive load research are reviewed first. The construct of cognitive load in the context of graph visualization is proposed and discussed. A model of user task performance, mental effort and cognitive load is proposed thereafter to further reveal the interacting relations between these three concepts. A cognitive load measure called mental effort is introduced and this measure is further combined with traditional performance measures into a single multi-dimensional measure called visualization efficiency. The proposed model and measurements are tested in a user study for validity. Implications of the cognitive load considerations in graph visualization are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Cited by 153 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Are pie charts evil? An assessment of the value of pie and donut charts compared to bar charts;Information Visualization;2024-06-24

2. Cognitive Psychology Meets Data Management: State of the Art and Future Directions;Companion of the 2024 International Conference on Management of Data;2024-06-09

3. Context or Clutter? Efficiently Matching Objects Across Scenes;Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval;2024-05-30

4. The Effect of Individual-Level Factors and Task Features on Interface Design for Rule-Verification Crowdsourcing Tasks;International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction;2024-04-16

5. Reviewing linkages between display design and cognitive biases in decision making: an emergency response perspective;Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science;2024-04-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3