Abstract
AbstractThis paper analyses the extent to which Kazakhstan’s agency in its interaction with China’s ‘Belt and Road’ initiative is shaped not only by Russia and China’s outward projection, but also de-centring practices at the regional and sub-national level. The Kazakhstani government has embraced China’s Silk Road economic belt (SREB—the land-based ‘belt’ of the BRI) and has aligned its ‘Nurly Zhol’ domestic stimulus programme with the SREB. At the same time, Kazakhstan’s membership in the Eurasian Economic Union increases Russian leverage over Kazakhstani trade and tariff policies. The advent of the BRI thus exacerbates, but has not caused, a partially competing logic behind Russia’s defensive regionalism and Kazakhstan’s professed multi-vector foreign policy. Contrasting the latter with Russian and Chinese geopolitical constraints imposed on the sociopolitical fabric of Kazakhstan, the paper examines how Kazakhstan is a microcosm for the dynamics of a new Eurasian order in the making.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference67 articles.
1. Alekseenkova, E. 2018. The EAEU by 2025: Priorities and Expectations of the Member States. In: Special Issue, Working Paper: EAEU Development Prospects up to 2025. Moscow: Russian International Affairs Council, pp. 6–39.
2. Allison, R. 2008. Virtual Regionalism, Regional Structures and Regime Security in Central Asia. Central Asian Survey 27(2): 185–202.
3. Bell, D. 2016. Communitarianism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/communitarianism/. Accessed 11 Dec 2019.
4. Blanchard, J.F., and C. Flint. 2017. The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics 22 (2): 223–245.
5. Brown, C. 1992. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献