Grand strategy and the construction of the national interest: the underpinnings of Sino-US strategic competition

Author:

Mokry SabineORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe ubiquity of Sino-US strategic competition calls for uncovering its underpinnings by systematically comparing their grand strategies. This article examines how both governments have constructed their countries’ national interest since the 2008 global financial crisis. Through quantitative content analysis, it traces the relative salience of different components of the construction of the national interest detailing differences and shifts in emphasis and divergences within both governments. Whereas the Chinese government increasingly emphasized taking on a leadership role in international affairs, the US government became more concerned about the country’s security and economic standing. Between Chinese actors, the most pronounced divergence appeared regarding the importance of territorial defense. US actors disagreed about the importance of promoting the country’s values abroad. These findings suggest that a long-term perspective is needed to uncover the underpinnings of great power competition. Researchers and policy-makers must listen to different foreign policy actors, even under centralized authoritarian rule.

Funder

Stiftung Begabtenförderung Cusanuswerk

GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies – Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference62 articles.

1. Barros, R. 2016. On the Outside Looking In: Secrecy and the Study of Authoritarian Regimes. Social Science Quarterly 97 (4): 953–973.

2. Balzacq, Thierry, and Barnier-Khawam, Pablo. 2021. Ideas and Ideology in Grand Strategy. In The Oxford Handbook of Grand Stategy, Oxford University Press, 159–172.

3. BBC News. 2011. China’s Economy Overtakes Japan’s’. 14 February. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/business-12445925. Accessed 2 February 2023.

4. Biegon, R. 2019. A Populist Grand Strategy? Trump and the Framing of American Decline. International Relations 33 (4): 517–539.

5. Blinken, A. 2022. The Administration’s Approach to the People’s Republic of China. Available at: https://www.state.gov/the-administrations-approach-to-the-peoples-republic-of-china/. Accessed 30 May 2022.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3