Abstract
AbstractBrexit—the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union—is at the same time historic, controversial and of enduring significance. That description applies to both the UK’s domestic politics and (the focus here) its external relations. This article introduces the special issue ‘Adapting to Brexit: Identity, Status and Role in UK Foreign Policy’. It suggests that Brexit has had a dual character–being a source of both anxiety and opportunity for the UK—and, in consequence, can be usefully analysed through the concept of role adaptation. A focus on national ‘roles’ is a well-established way to think about what drives foreign policy. But role only makes sense when linked to the parallel concepts of status and identity. Insofar as Brexit has challenged (or, for some, has boosted), the status and identity of the UK, then so role adaptation becomes necessary. This piece outlines all three concepts—role, identity and status—placing them at the service of an analysis of Brexit’s effects on British foreign policy. That framing is then deployed in the thematic articles which follow.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference57 articles.
1. Beasley, R., J. Kaarbo, and K. Oppermann. 2021. Role Theory, Foreign Policy, and the Social Construction of Sovereignty: Brexit Stage Right. Global Studies Quarterly 1(1). https://academic.oup.com/isagsq/article/1/1/ksab001/6153025. Accessed 20 September 2022.
2. Blagden, D. 2019. Two Visions of Greatness: Roleplay and Realpolitik in UK Strategic Posture. Foreign Policy Analysis 15(4): 470–491.
3. Buckledee, S. 2018. The Language of Brexit: How Britain Talked Itself Out of the European Union. London: Bloomsbury.
4. Buzan, B. 2004. The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity.
5. Cantir, C., and J. Kaarbo. 2012. Contested Roles and Domestic Politics: Reflections and Role Theory in Foreign Policy Analysis and IR Theory. Foreign Policy Analysis 8(1): 5–24.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献