The Problem of the Modern

Author:

Shorten Richard

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan UK

Reference113 articles.

1. Note that my intended meaning of ‘elements’ in connection with totalitarianism differs from Arendt’s. Arendt locates elements in the pre-history of totalitarianism (in the age of imperialism, for example). Her elements then ‘crystallise’ at a later point in time to constitute totalitarianism itself (see Hannah Arendt, ‘A Reply to Eric Voegelin’, in Arendt, Essays in Understanding, 1930–54, ed. Jerome Kohn [New York: Schocken, 2005], 401–8). I work the other way around. ‘Elements’ are observed within the actual experience of totalitarianism; and by working backwards, the strands of thought that shape a general combination of elements are identified and evaluated. Arendt also constructs elements more narrowly than I do because she is specifically concerned with the influence of ‘practices’, as opposed to the influence of ‘ideas’. See Canovan, Hannah Arendt, 23.

2. For criticisms of the uses of ‘modernity’ in the humanities and social sciences, see Bernard Yack, The Fetishism of Modernities: Epoch Self-Consciousness in Contemporary Social and Political Thought (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1997). As Yack argues, thinking within the limits of pre-specified categories can actually obscure the novelty and specificity of the problem at hand: distinctive developments are obscured by ahistorical generalisations. For a general indictment of ‘medicine’,

3. see Mario Biogoli, ‘Science, Modernity, and the “Final Solution”’, in Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the ‘Final Solution’, ed. Saul Friedlander (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), 185–206.

4. Perhaps the most pronounced example of this tendency for accounts of political religion to focus on violence is Michael Burleigh. See Burleigh, Earthly Powers: Religion and Politics in Europe from the French Revolution to the Great War (London: HarperCollins, 2005), and Sacred Causes: Religion and Politics from the European Dictators to Al Qaeda (London: HarperPress, 2006).

5. Arthur Koestler, Darkness at Noon, trans. by Daphne Hardy (London: Bantam Books, 1968 [orig. 1940]).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3