1. Fidler et al. define ‘Eastphalia’ as challenging ‘Western preferences for universal adoption of transnational principles, such as democracy, free market economics, and human rights’. David P. Fidler, S. W. Kim and S. Ganguly (2009) ‘Eastphalia Rising? Asian Influence and the Fate of Human Security’, Faculty Publications, Paper 114: 53, 56.
2. A. Acharya (2011b) ‘Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule Making in the Third World, International Studies Quarterly, 55: 97.
3. A. Hurrell (1995) ‘Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective’ in L. Fawcett and A. Hurrell (eds) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order (Oxford University Press: New York), p. 39.
4. B. Hettne, A. Inotai and O. Sunkel (eds) (2000) National Perspectives on the New Regionalism in the South, Vol. 2 (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd), p. xviii.
5. P. J. Katzenstein (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), p. 9.