1. R. M. Chisholm (1991) ‘Firth and the Ethics of Belief’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LI. 1, pp. 119–28 (the quotation is from p. 119).
2. See also R. M. Chisholm (1956) ‘Epistemic Statements and the Ethics of Belief’, Since writing this essay I have returned to the topic of intellectual integrity in several papers: see ‘Confessions of an Old- Fashioned Prig’ in S. Haack (1998), Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 7–30; (2008 [2005]) ‘The Ideal of Intellectual Integrity, in Life and Literature’ in S. Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work: Inquiry and Its Place in Culture (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books), pp. 195–208; and (2007) ‘Engaging with the Engaged Inquirer: Response to Mark Migotti’ in C. de Waal (ed.) Susan Haack: A Lady of Distinctions (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books), pp. 277–80. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XVI, pp. 447–60;
3. R. M. Chisholm (1957) Perceiving: A Philosophical Study ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press);
4. R. Firth (1959) ‘Chisholm and the Ethics of Belief’, Philosophical Review, 68, pp. 493–506;
5. R. M. Chisholm (1956) ‘“Appear,” “Take,” and “Evident”’, Journal of Philosophy, LIII. 23, pp. 722–31;