Abstract
AbstractWhile stocks with high dividends have historically outperformed those with low dividends, we show that the difference can be completely explained by a set of well-known factors including value, quality and defensive. Applying a dividend filter to a portfolio of strategies having high exposure to these factors yields sub-optimal results. To test whether incorporating dividend yields can improve the performance of long-only factor portfolios, we construct a set of dividend-favored long-only factor portfolios with a heuristic rebalance algorithm and find that their after-tax net returns are lower than the dividend-agnostic counterparts. Collectively our results indicate that long-only active investors are better off loading directly on value, quality and defensive factors than purposely tilting their portfolios toward high-dividend stocks.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference35 articles.
1. Arnott, Rob, Vitali Kalesnik, and Trevor Schuesler. 2018. Is your alpha big enough to cover its taxes? A quarter-century retrospective. Journal of Portfolio Management 44 (5): 78.
2. Asness, Clifford S. 2017. Virtue is Its Own Reward or One Mans Ceiling is Another Mans Floor. AQR Working Paper. https://www.aqr.com/insights/perspectives/virtue-is-its-own-reward-or-one-mans-ceiling-isanother-mans-floor.
3. Barclay, Michael J. 1987. Dividends, taxes, and common stock prices: The ex-dividend day behavior of common stock prices before the income tax. Journal of Financial Economics 19 (1): 31–44.
4. Bergstresser, Daniel, and Jeffrey Pontiff. 2013. Investment taxation and portfolio performance. Journal of Public Economics 97: 245–257.
5. Black, Fischer, and Myron Scholes. 1974. The effects of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns. Journal of Financial Economics 1 (1): 1–22.