Crypto-asset regulatory landscape: a comparative analysis of the crypto-asset regulation in the UK and Germany

Author:

Wronka ChristophORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this research paper is to compare and analyse how crypto-assets are regulated in the UK and Germany. The aim is to understand and highlight the approaches taken by these two countries in terms of regulating crypto-assets and to explore the potential impact that their regulatory frameworks could have on the market for these crypto-assets. The research employs a doctrinal research design to examine the crypto-asset regulatory regimes in the UK and Germany. A comprehensive review of existing literature, official regulatory documents and relevant legal frameworks is conducted to understand the core components of each country's crypto-asset regulations. The findings of this study reveal divergences in the regulatory approaches of the UK and Germany towards crypto-assets. While the UK has embraced a principles-based regulatory framework, fostering innovation and industry growth, Germany has adopted a more prescriptive and cautious approach, focusing on investor protection and market stability. The research identifies that the UK's flexible approach has attracted a flourishing crypto-asset ecosystem, while Germany's conservative stance has offered greater investor confidence. However, certain regulatory gaps and challenges persist in both jurisdictions, such as ambiguities in classification and tax treatment, requiring further attention.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference50 articles.

1. Alaassar, A., A.L. Mention, and T.H. Aas. 2023. Facilitating innovation in FinTech: a review and research agenda. Review of Managerial Science 17 (1): 33–66.

2. Allen, J.G., Wells, H. and Mauer, M., 2022. Crypto-assets in Private Law: Emerging Trends and Open Questions from the First 10 Years. SMU Centre for AI & Data Governance Research Paper, (06).

3. Ariesmansyah, A., 2022. Creativity to innovation: What lesson learned from digital transformation in financial accountability in government practices? Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4): 14061–14072.

4. Armata, R., 2023. Cryptocurrency in Germany: Is it regulated and safe? Idnow. Available at: https://www.idnow.io/blog/cryptocurrency-germany-regulations/#:~:text=On%20a%20national%20level%2C%20although,related%20to%20securities%20and%20investments (Accessed: 11 January 2024).

5. Baiod, W., J. Light, and A. Mahanti. 2021. Blockchain technology and its applications across multiple domains: A survey. Journal of International Technology and Information Management 29 (4): 78–119.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3