Abstract
AbstractEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores are a key tool for asset managers in designing and implementing ESG investment strategies. They, however, amalgamate a broad range of fundamentally different factors, creating ambiguity for investors as to the underlying drivers of higher or lower ESG scores. We explore the feasibility and performance of more targeted investment strategies based on specific ESG categories by deconstructing ESG scores into their granular components. We implement “best-in-class” strategies by excluding firms with the lowest category scores and reinvesting the proceeds in firms with the highest scores, maintaining the same regional and sectoral composition. These approaches reduce the portfolio’s tracking error and slightly improve its risk-adjusted performance, while still yielding large gains in targeted ESG scores.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Amel-Zadeh, A., and G. Serafeim. 2021. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal 74 (3): 87–103.
2. Berg, F., J. Koelbel, and R. Rigobon. 2021b. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance 26 (6): 1315–1344.
3. Berg, F., K. Fabisik, and Z. Sautner (2021). Rewriting history II: The (un)predictable past of ESG ratings. ECGI Finance Working Paper No. 708/2020.
4. Billio, M., M. Costola, I. Histova, C. Latino, and L. Pelizzon. 2021. Inside the ESG ratings: (dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28 (5): 1426–1445.
5. Bloomberg (2021). ESG assets rising to $50 trillion will reshape $140.5 trillion of global AUM by 2025, finds Bloomberg Intelligence. Bloomberg, 21 July. Available at https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/esg-assets-rising-to-50-trillion-will-reshape-140-5-trillion-of-global-aum-by-2025-finds-bloomberg-intelligence/.