1. Baldry, E., Dowse, L., & Clarence, M. (2012). People with intellectual and other cognitive disability in the criminal justice system. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of New South Wales. Retrieved from
http://www.adhc.nsw.govau/__data/assets/file/0003/264054/Intellectual_and_cognitive_disability_ in_criminal_justice_system.pdf
/__data/assets/file/0003/264054/Intellectual_and_cognitive_disability_ in_criminal_justice_system.pdf
2. Barnes, K., Marateo, R., & Ferris, S. P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4). Retrieved from:
http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol3_issue4/Teaching_and_Learning_with_the_Net_Generation.pdf
/pdf/vol3_issue4/Teaching_and_Learning_with_the_Net_Generation.pdf
3. Baviskar 1, S. N, Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541–550.
4. Bedford, T., Dearden, R., & Dorman, M. (2005, October). Offender rehabilitation and information literacy: a case for providing appropriate prisoner access to contemporary ICT. Paper presented at the Australasian Corrections Education Association conference, Darwin, NT, Australia. Retrieved from
http://www.acea.org.au/Content/2005%20papers/Paper%20Bedford%20et%20al.pdf
/Content/2005%20papers/Paper%20Bedford%20et%20al.pdf
5. Bellefeuille, G., Martin, R., & Buck, M. (2005). From pedagogy to techna-gogy in social work education: a constructivist approach to instructional design in an online, competency-based child welfare practice course. Child & Youth Care Forum, 34(5), 371–389.