Author:
Aitmambet Zharas,Dickman Joseph,Frölich Markus,Pasha Atika,Prowse Martin,Puri Jyotsna,Sharma Neha,Weiss Arne R.
Abstract
AbstractThis article describes the approach for an evidence review that combines two different evidence gap maps into one learning exercise on transformational change. The review assesses the evidence in two sectors where there has been demonstrable progress in terms of scale, depth and permanence of change: in energy and in behavioural change in public health. The review uses causal evidence to assess how lessons about transformational change in these two sectors may inform climate change mitigation and adaptation investments in low- and middle-income countries. The evidence gap maps will inform the scope of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Arnott, B., L. Rehackova, L. Errington, F.F. Sniehotta, J. Roberts, and V. Araujo-Soares. 2014. Efficacy of behavioural interventions for transport behaviour change: Systematic review, meta-analysis and intervention coding. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 11: 133.
2. Banerjee, A., R. Banerji, J. Berry, E. Duflo, H. Kannan, S. Mukerji, M. Shotland, and M. Walton. 2017. From proof of concept to scalable policies: Challenges and solutions, with an application. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31: 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.73.
3. Bassett, T.J., and C. Fogelman. 2013. Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 48: 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010.
4. Borenstein, M., L.V. Hedges, J.P. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein. 2011. Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.
5. Bouye, M., S. Hammeling, and N.-S. Schuld. 2018. Connecting the dots: Elements for a joined-up implementation of the 2030 Agenda and Paris Agreement. UNI Global Compact.