Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity

Author:

Apgar Marina,Snijder Mieke,Higdon Grace Lyn,Szabo Sylvia

Abstract

AbstractLarge publicly funded programmes of research continue to receive increased investment as interventions aiming to produce impact for the world’s poorest and most marginalized populations. At this intersection of research and development, research is expected to contribute to complex processes of societal change. Embracing a co-produced view of impact as emerging along uncertain causal pathways often without predefined outcomes calls for innovation in the use of complexity-aware approaches to evaluation. The papers in this special issue present rich experiences of authors working across sectors and geographies, employing methodological innovation and navigating power as they reconcile tensions. They illustrate the challenges with (i) evaluating performance to meet accountability demands while fostering learning for adaptation; (ii) evaluating prospective theories of change while capturing emergent change; (iii) evaluating internal relational dimensions while measuring external development outcomes; (iv) evaluating across scales: from measuring local level end impact to understanding contributions to systems level change. Taken as a whole, the issue illustrates how the research for development evaluation field is maturing through the experiences of a growing and diverse group of researchers and evaluators as they shift from using narrow accountability instruments to appreciating emergent causal pathways within research for development.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference79 articles.

1. Aiginger, K., and M. Schratzenstaller. 2016. New dynamics for Europe: Reaping the benefits of socio-ecological transition. Synthesis report part I (research report no. 11). WWWforEurope Deliverable. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/169308.

2. Apgar, M., K. Hernandez, and G. Ton. 2020. Contribution analysis for adaptive management, Briefing Note, London: Overseas Development Institute, 14.

3. Apgar, M., M. Snijder, P. Prieto Martin, G. Ton, S. Macleod, S. Kakri, and S. Paul. 2022. Designing contribution analysis of participatory programming to tackle the worst forms of child labour. CLARISSA research and evidence paper 2, brighton: institute of development studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/CLARISSA.2022.003

4. Aronsson, I.-L., and H. Hassnain. 2019. Value-based evaluations for transformative change. In: Evaluation for Transformational Change: Opportunities and challenges for the Sustainable Development Goals, (eds.) Rob D. van den Berg, Cristina Magro and Silvia Salinas Mulder. Exeter, UK: IDEAS. 89.

5. Aston, T., and M. Apgar. 2022. The Art and Craft of Bricolage in Evaluation, CDI Practice Paper 24, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/IDS.2022.068.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3