Abstract
AbstractInfrastructure development, central to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is crucial for facilitating structural transformation. However, numerous critics contend that the Initiative serves as a tool for China to engage in debt-trap diplomacy, which fails to deliver actual development in Africa. Therefore, assessing whether BRI projects will facilitate the necessary structural transformation in these countries requires meticulous analysis. Given the extended project cycle typical of infrastructure development, evaluating the overall socioeconomic impacts of the BRI is challenging. Nonetheless, these projects are likely to be implemented as part of the expansion of China's existing model for overseas infrastructure projects. This model is characterized by a reliance on concessional loans and credit facilities for financing, and state-owned enterprises as contractors. Contrary to the debt-trap diplomacy narrative, our findings, based on panel data and staggered difference-in-differences analysis, indicate that Chinese projects have positively impacted multiple aspects of Africa's structural transformation process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Anderlini, J. 2018. Interview: We say, if you want to get rich, build roads first. Financial Times.
2. Barro, R.J., and J.W. Lee. 2013. A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics 104: 184–198.
3. Brautigam, D. 2019. Chinese loans and African structural transformation. In China-Africa and an economic transformation, ed. A. Oqubay and J.Y. Lin, 129–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Brautigam, D. 2020. A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’: The rise of a meme. Area Development and Policy 5 (1): 1–14.
5. Brautigam, D., and J. Hwang. 2016. Eastern promises: New data on Chinese loans in Africa, 2000 to 2014. Working Paper.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献