Abstract
AbstractDrawing on long-term ethnographic research with Muslims in India, this article suggests that religion should not (only) be understood as a sub-category of development but as an integral part of the meta-ontology based on which one should engage with development initially. Value-driven development implies a normative view of society, and a ‘more human’ society is at the core of worthwhile development. For the research participants, their ontological conceptions (notions of what being human means) and the ethical autonomy to deliberate on a normative view of life and society are embedded in the Islamic dharma. To approach religion as only a sub-category in an otherwise secular development framework marginalises these, and probably many other, religious life experiences and ontological notions from the outset. Instead, secular and religious ontologies should be considered at par in an inclusive dialogue on worthwhile development.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference74 articles.
1. Alam, M.S. 2010. Social Exclusion of Muslims in India and Deficient Debates about Affirmative Action Suggestions for a New Approach. South Asia Research 30 (1): 43–65.
2. Alam, M.S., and S. Raju. 2007. Contextualising Inter-, Intra-religious and Gendered Literacy and Educational Disparities in Rural Bihar. Economic and Political Weekly 42: 1613–1622.
3. Alkire, S. 2000. Valuing Freedoms. Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Ansari, I.A. 2006. Political Representation of Muslims in India: 1952–2004. Delhi: Manak.
5. Artaraz, K., and M. Calestani. 2014. Suma Qamaña in Bolivia Indigenous Understandings of Well-being and Their Contribution to a Post-Neoliberal Paradigm. Latin American Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14547501.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献