Abstract
AbstractEuropean insurers are allowed to make discretionary decisions in the calculation of Solvency II capital requirements. These choices include the design of risk models (ranging from a standard formula to a full internal model) and the use of long-term guarantees measures. This article examines the situation of insurers that utilize the discretionary scope regarding capital requirements for market risks. In a first step of our analysis, we assess the risk profiles of 49 stock insurers using daily market data. In a second step, we exploit hand-collected Solvency II data for the years 2016 to 2020. We find that long-term guarantees measures substantially influence the reported solvency ratios. The measures are chosen particularly by less solvent insurers and those with high interest rate and sovereign credit risk sensitivities. Internal models are used more frequently by large insurers and especially for market risks for which they have already found adequate immunization strategies.
Funder
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Asadi, S., and M.A.M. Janabi. 2020. Measuring market and credit risk under Solvency II: Evaluation of the standard technique versus internal models for stock and bond markets. European Actuarial Journal 10: 425–456.
2. BaFin. 2020. 2020 Annual Report-Federal Financial Supervisory Authority. https://www.bafin.de/EN/PublikationenDaten/Jahresbericht/jahresbericht_node_en.html.
3. Berends, K., R. McMenamin, T. Plestis, and R. Rosen. 2013. The sensitivity of life insurance firms to interest rate changes. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives 37 (2): 47–78.
4. Braun, A., H. Schmeiser, and F. Schreiber. 2017. Portfolio optimization under Solvency II: Implicit constraints imposed by the market risk standard formula. Journal of Risk and Insurance 84 (1): 177–207.
5. Brechmann, E.C., and C. Czado. 2013. Risk management with high-dimensional vine copulas: An analysis oft the Euro Stoxx 50. Statistics & Risk Modeling 30 (4): 307–342.