Abstract
AbstractFocusing bias is one of the key contributors to over-borrowing. It describes how people, when making choices, give disproportionate attention and weight to attributes in which their options differ more. In a loan decision, a consumer excessively focuses on the eye-catching difference between getting the loan and not getting it, while ignoring the smaller differences between making and not making repayments. Here, we show a simple trick that nudges the consumer to increase attention on the repayment dimension. In two experimental studies involving one hypothetical loan decision, we demonstrate that the salience of getting the loan can be decreased if one offered plan includes high initial installments. This steeply decreasing installment plan (i.e., with initially high installments that decrease over time) offered alongside the usual flat installments plan (i.e., with equally sized repayments through the whole term) increases consumers’ attention to making repayments, and consequently, they attend less to obtaining the loan. When the choice set includes the steeply decreasing plan, we observe a decreased preference for the flat installment plan and a shift toward not borrowing. Additionally, making repayments on the loan is perceived as a greater burden, and more attention is given to making repayments when the steep plan is present. Policy may combat harmful loan consumption by prescribing the presentation of loan offers such that at least one option includes high initial repayments, which increases attention on making repayments.
Funder
FWF - Austrian Science Fund
Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
University of Vienna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Abaluck, J. 2011. What Would We Eat if We Knew More: The Implications of a Large-Scale Change in Nutrition Labeling, Working Paper, MIT. Available at: http://economics.stanford.edu/files/Abaluck10_28.pdf.
2. Akers, B., and M. M. Chingos .2014. Is a student loan crisis on the horizon?. Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution.
3. Bakó, B., G. Neszveda, and L. Dezső. 2018. When irrelevant alternatives do matter: The effect of focusing on loan decisions. Theory and Decision 84: 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9641-9.
4. Berk, J., and P. DeMarzo. 2014. Corporate finance, 3rd ed. Boston: Prentice-Hall.
5. Brown, S., et al. 2005. Debt and financial expectations: An individual- and household-level analysis. Economic Inquiry 43 (1): 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbi008.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献