1. Graham S. Pearson, The UNSCOM Saga: Chemical and Biological Weapons Non-Proliferation (London and New York: Macmillan Press, 1999), p. 65.
2. Reprinted in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 2.
3. Strange found five grounds for criticizing the approach: it might be a passing fad, it was imprecise, it was value-loaded and implied things that should not be taken for granted, it was too static a view of things and, finally, it was too state-centred. She argued that ‘regime was yet one more woolly concept’ that is a fertile source of discussion simply because people mean different things when they use it. Susan Strange, ‘Cave hic dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis’, in Krasner, International Regimes, pp. 338–51.
4. Joseph Cirincione (ed.), Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York and London: Routledge, 2000), p. 3
5. and Joseph Cirincione with Jon B. Wolfsthal and Miriam Rajkumar, Deadly Arsenals: Tracking Weapons of Mass Destruction (Washington, DC: Carnegie for International Peace, 2002), p. 25.