Author:
Katainen Anu,Gronow Antti
Abstract
AbstractUnhealthy behaviours are more prevalent in lower than in higher socioeconomic groups. Sociological attempts to explain the socioeconomic patterning of health-related behaviour typically draw on practice theories, as well as on the concept of lifestyles. When accounting for “sticky” habits and social structures, studies often ignore individuals’ capacity for reflection. The opposite is also true: research on individual-level factors has difficulty with the social determinants of behaviour. We argue that the pragmatist concept of habit is not only a precursor to practice theories but also offers a dynamic and action-oriented understanding of the mechanisms that “recruit” individuals to health-related practices. In pragmatism, habits are not merely repetitive behaviours, but creative solutions to problems confronted in everyday life and reflect individuals’ relationships to the material and social world around them. Ideally, the pragmatist conception of habits lays the theoretical ground for efficient prevention of and effective support for behaviour change.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)
Reference79 articles.
1. Adams, M. 2006. Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity? Sociology 40 (3): 511–528.
2. Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behaviour, ed. J. Kuhi and J. Beckmann, 11–39. Heidelberg: Springer.
3. Archer, M. 2005. Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baert, P. 2005. Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity.
5. Banwell, C., J. Dixon, D. Broom, and A. Davies. 2010. Habits of a lifetime: Family dining patterns over the lifecourse of older Australians. Health Sociology Review 19 (3): 343–355.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献